1983 Holden Gemini vs. 2005 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Holden Gemini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Holden Gemini would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1983 Holden Gemini. (66 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1983 Holden Gemini.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Holden Gemini. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Holden Gemini. (110 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Holden Gemini.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Holden Gemini | 2005 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Holden | Jeep |
| Model | Gemini | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1584 cc | 3966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 110 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2630 mm |
