1983 Holden Gemini vs. 2006 Mazda 6
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Holden Gemini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Holden Gemini would be higher. At 2,964 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1983 Holden Gemini. (66 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1983 Holden Gemini. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Holden Gemini weights approximately 145 kg more than 2006 Mazda 6.
Because 1983 Holden Gemini is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Holden Gemini. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (270 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Holden Gemini. (110 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Holden Gemini.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Holden Gemini | 2006 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | Gemini | 6 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1584 cc | 2964 cc |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 110 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 955 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2680 mm |