1983 Holden Gemini vs. 2009 Mazda CX-7
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Holden Gemini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Holden Gemini would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-7 (235 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 1983 Holden Gemini. (66 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 1983 Holden Gemini.
Because 2009 Mazda CX-7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Holden Gemini. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-7 (351 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 241 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Holden Gemini. (110 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda CX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Holden Gemini.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Holden Gemini | 2009 Mazda CX-7 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | Gemini | CX-7 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1584 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 235 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 110 Nm | 351 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2760 mm |