1983 Holden Gemini vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Holden Gemini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Holden Gemini would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Matrix (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1983 Holden Gemini. (53 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1983 Holden Gemini.
Because 1983 Holden Gemini is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Holden Gemini. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Toyota Matrix (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Holden Gemini. (105 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2012 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Holden Gemini.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Holden Gemini | 2012 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Holden | Toyota |
Model | Gemini | Matrix |
Year Released | 1983 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1817 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 105 Nm | 219 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2601 mm |