1983 Honda Ballade vs. 2009 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2009 Lotus Evora is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Honda Ballade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Honda Ballade would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Lotus Evora is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Lotus Evora (276 HP) has 209 more horse power than 1983 Honda Ballade. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 1983 Honda Ballade.
Because 2009 Lotus Evora is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Lotus Evora. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Honda Ballade, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Lotus Evora (342 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 234 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Honda Ballade. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Lotus Evora will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Honda Ballade.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Honda Ballade | 2009 Lotus Evora | |
Make | Honda | Lotus |
Model | Ballade | Evora |
Year Released | 1983 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1335 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 276 HP |
Torque | 108 Nm | 342 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1230 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2580 mm |