1983 Jaguar XJR vs. 1992 Rover 220
To start off, 1992 Rover 220 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1983 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Rover 220 weights approximately 253 kg more than 1983 Jaguar XJR.
Because 1983 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Rover 220, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Jaguar XJR | 1992 Rover 220 | |
Make | Jaguar | Rover |
Model | XJR | 220 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5343 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1153 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 55 L |