1983 Jaguar XJR vs. 1997 Lotus Elise
To start off, 1997 Lotus Elise is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1983 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 195 kg more than 1997 Lotus Elise.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Jaguar XJR | 1997 Lotus Elise | |
Make | Jaguar | Lotus |
Model | XJR | Elise |
Year Released | 1983 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Middle | Middle |
Engine Size | 5343 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 117 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 705 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 40 L |