1983 Jaguar XJR vs. 2003 Renault Clio
To start off, 2003 Renault Clio is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1983 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Renault Clio weights approximately 205 kg more than 1983 Jaguar XJR.
Because 1983 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Jaguar XJR | 2003 Renault Clio | |
Make | Jaguar | Renault |
Model | XJR | Clio |
Year Released | 1983 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5343 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 177 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 50 L |