1983 Jaguar XJR vs. 2005 Mercedes-Benz E500
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz E500 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1983 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz E500 weights approximately 829 kg more than 1983 Jaguar XJR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Jaguar XJR | 2005 Mercedes-Benz E500 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | XJR | E500 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5343 cc | 4966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 302 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1729 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 80 L |
