1983 Jaguar XJR vs. 2005 Smart Roadster
To start off, 2005 Smart Roadster is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1983 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Jaguar XJR | 2005 Smart Roadster | |
Make | Jaguar | Smart |
Model | XJR | Roadster |
Year Released | 1983 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Middle | Rear |
Engine Size | 5343 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 3430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 35 L |