1983 Jaguar XJR vs. 2005 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2005 Subaru Outback is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1983 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Subaru Outback weights approximately 710 kg more than 1983 Jaguar XJR.
Because 2005 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Jaguar XJR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Jaguar XJR | 2005 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Jaguar | Subaru |
Model | XJR | Outback |
Year Released | 1983 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5343 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 242 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 64 L |