1983 Jaguar XJR vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz A
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz A is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1983 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mercedes-Benz A weights approximately 885 kg more than 1983 Jaguar XJR.
Because 1983 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz A, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Jaguar XJR | 2006 Mercedes-Benz A | |
Make | Jaguar | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | XJR | A |
Year Released | 1983 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5343 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1785 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 60 L |