1983 Jaguar XJR vs. 2006 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2006 Toyota Tundra is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1983 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 455 kg more than 1983 Jaguar XJR.
Because 2006 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Jaguar XJR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Jaguar XJR | 2006 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Jaguar | Toyota |
Model | XJR | Tundra |
Year Released | 1983 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5343 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 236 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 5550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 3270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 100 L |