1983 Jaguar XJR vs. 2010 Audi A5
To start off, 2010 Audi A5 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1983 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Audi A5 weights approximately 860 kg more than 1983 Jaguar XJR.
Because 2010 Audi A5 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Jaguar XJR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi A5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Jaguar XJR | 2010 Audi A5 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Audi |
| Model | XJR | A5 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5343 cc | 3197 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 261 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1760 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4623 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1852 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1382 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2751 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 67 L |
