1983 Jaguar XJR vs. 2012 Cadillac Escalade
To start off, 2012 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1719 kg more than 1983 Jaguar XJR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Jaguar XJR | 2012 Cadillac Escalade | |
| Make | Jaguar | Cadillac |
| Model | XJR | Escalade |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5343 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 403 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 2619 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 5639 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 2009 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1892 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 3302 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 117 L |
