1983 Jaguar XJR vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1983 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1983 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Jaguar XJR | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Jaguar | Holden |
Model | XJR | Epica |
Year Released | 1983 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5343 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 153 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2700 mm |