1983 Jaguar XJR vs. 2013 Audi A6
To start off, 2013 Audi A6 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1983 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Audi A6 weights approximately 774 kg more than 1983 Jaguar XJR.
Because 2013 Audi A6 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Jaguar XJR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Jaguar XJR | 2013 Audi A6 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Audi |
| Model | XJR | A6 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5343 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | W |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 208 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1674 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4925 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 2086 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1468 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2912 mm |
