1983 Jaguar XJS vs. 1986 Plymouth Sundance
To start off, 1986 Plymouth Sundance is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jaguar XJS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jaguar XJS would be higher. At 3,590 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Jaguar XJS (226 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1986 Plymouth Sundance. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Jaguar XJS should accelerate faster than 1986 Plymouth Sundance. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Jaguar XJS weights approximately 485 kg more than 1986 Plymouth Sundance. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1983 Jaguar XJS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Jaguar XJS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Jaguar XJS | 1986 Plymouth Sundance | |
Make | Jaguar | Plymouth |
Model | XJS | Sundance |
Year Released | 1983 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3590 cc | 2211 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1660 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2470 mm |