1983 Jaguar XJS vs. 1995 Nissan AA-X
To start off, 1995 Nissan AA-X is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jaguar XJS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jaguar XJS would be higher. At 3,590 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Jaguar XJS weights approximately 400 kg more than 1995 Nissan AA-X.
Because 1983 Jaguar XJS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Jaguar XJS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Nissan AA-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Jaguar XJS | 1995 Nissan AA-X | |
Make | Jaguar | Nissan |
Model | XJS | AA-X |
Year Released | 1983 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3590 cc | 1273 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1660 kg | 1260 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2530 mm |