1983 Jaguar XJS vs. 2002 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2002 Mini Cooper is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jaguar XJS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jaguar XJS would be higher. At 3,590 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Jaguar XJS (226 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 2002 Mini Cooper. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Jaguar XJS should accelerate faster than 2002 Mini Cooper.
Because 1983 Jaguar XJS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Jaguar XJS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mini Cooper, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Jaguar XJS (325 Nm) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mini Cooper. (149 Nm). This means 1983 Jaguar XJS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mini Cooper.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Jaguar XJS | 2002 Mini Cooper | |
Make | Jaguar | Mini |
Model | XJS | Cooper |
Year Released | 1983 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3590 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 149 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2470 mm |