1983 Jeep CJ vs. 1972 Lancia 2000
To start off, 1983 Jeep CJ is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Lancia 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Lancia 2000 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Lancia 2000 (114 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1983 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Lancia 2000 should accelerate faster than 1983 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Jeep CJ weights approximately 100 kg more than 1972 Lancia 2000.
Because 1983 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Lancia 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Lancia 2000 (171 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1972 Lancia 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Jeep CJ | 1972 Lancia 2000 | |
Make | Jeep | Lancia |
Model | CJ | 2000 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1972 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 171 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1190 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2490 mm |