1983 Jeep CJ vs. 1972 Triumph Spitfire
To start off, 1983 Jeep CJ is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Triumph Spitfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Triumph Spitfire would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Jeep CJ (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1972 Triumph Spitfire. (47 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Jeep CJ should accelerate faster than 1972 Triumph Spitfire. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Jeep CJ weights approximately 510 kg more than 1972 Triumph Spitfire. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 Jeep CJ (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Triumph Spitfire. (83 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1983 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Triumph Spitfire.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Jeep CJ | 1972 Triumph Spitfire | |
Make | Jeep | Triumph |
Model | CJ | Spitfire |
Year Released | 1983 | 1972 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1296 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 3790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2110 mm |