1983 Jeep CJ vs. 1984 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 1984 Mazda RX-7 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1984 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Mazda RX-7 (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1983 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 1983 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Jeep CJ weights approximately 230 kg more than 1984 Mazda RX-7.
Because 1983 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Mazda RX-7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Jeep CJ (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Mazda RX-7. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1983 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Jeep CJ | 1984 Mazda RX-7 | |
| Make | Jeep | Mazda |
| Model | CJ | RX-7 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1984 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2292 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1060 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2430 mm |
