1983 Jeep CJ vs. 1987 Lada Samara
To start off, 1987 Lada Samara is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Jeep CJ (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1987 Lada Samara. (52 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Jeep CJ should accelerate faster than 1987 Lada Samara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Jeep CJ weights approximately 365 kg more than 1987 Lada Samara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1983 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1987 Lada Samara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Jeep CJ | 1987 Lada Samara | |
| Make | Jeep | Lada |
| Model | CJ | Samara |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1987 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1100 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 52 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 925 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2470 mm |
