1983 Jeep CJ vs. 1991 Renault Clio
To start off, 1991 Renault Clio is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Renault Clio (93 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1983 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1983 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Jeep CJ weights approximately 295 kg more than 1991 Renault Clio.
Because 1983 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1991 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Jeep CJ (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Renault Clio. (142 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1983 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Jeep CJ | 1991 Renault Clio | |
Make | Jeep | Renault |
Model | CJ | Clio |
Year Released | 1983 | 1991 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 142 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 995 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 3720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2480 mm |