1983 Jeep CJ vs. 1993 Suzuki Swift
To start off, 1993 Suzuki Swift is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Jeep CJ (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1993 Suzuki Swift. (66 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Jeep CJ should accelerate faster than 1993 Suzuki Swift. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Jeep CJ weights approximately 460 kg more than 1993 Suzuki Swift. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1983 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1993 Suzuki Swift. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Jeep CJ (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Suzuki Swift. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1983 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Suzuki Swift.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Jeep CJ | 1993 Suzuki Swift | |
Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
Model | CJ | Swift |
Year Released | 1983 | 1993 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 830 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1590 mm |