1983 Jeep CJ vs. 1997 Acura EL
To start off, 1997 Acura EL is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Acura EL (127 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1983 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Acura EL should accelerate faster than 1983 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Jeep CJ weights approximately 211 kg more than 1997 Acura EL.
Because 1983 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Acura EL. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Jeep CJ (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Acura EL. (145 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1983 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Acura EL.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Jeep CJ | 1997 Acura EL | |
Make | Jeep | Acura |
Model | CJ | EL |
Year Released | 1983 | 1997 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 127 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1079 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4478 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1704 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1394 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2619 mm |