1983 Jeep CJ vs. 1999 Renault Avantime
To start off, 1999 Renault Avantime is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Renault Avantime is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Renault Avantime (108 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1983 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Renault Avantime should accelerate faster than 1983 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Renault Avantime weights approximately 285 kg more than 1983 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1983 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Renault Avantime. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Renault Avantime (255 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm). This means 1999 Renault Avantime will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Jeep CJ | 1999 Renault Avantime | |
| Make | Jeep | Renault |
| Model | CJ | Avantime |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 255 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1575 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2630 mm |
