1983 Jeep CJ vs. 2002 Maserati Coupe
To start off, 2002 Maserati Coupe is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 4,244 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Maserati Coupe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Maserati Coupe (390 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 305 more horse power than 1983 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Maserati Coupe should accelerate faster than 1983 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Maserati Coupe weights approximately 385 kg more than 1983 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1983 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Maserati Coupe. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Maserati Coupe (451 Nm) has 301 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm). This means 2002 Maserati Coupe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Jeep CJ | 2002 Maserati Coupe | |
Make | Jeep | Maserati |
Model | CJ | Coupe |
Year Released | 1983 | 2002 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 4244 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 390 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 451 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1675 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2670 mm |