1983 Jeep CJ vs. 2004 Kia Rio
To start off, 2004 Kia Rio is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Kia Rio (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1983 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Kia Rio should accelerate faster than 1983 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Jeep CJ weights approximately 200 kg more than 2004 Kia Rio.
Because 1983 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Kia Rio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Jeep CJ (150 Nm) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Kia Rio. (141 Nm). This means 1983 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Kia Rio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Jeep CJ | 2004 Kia Rio | |
| Make | Jeep | Kia |
| Model | CJ | Rio |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2004 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1590 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 141 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2390 mm |
