1983 Jeep CJ vs. 2004 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2004 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lotec C 1000 (844 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 759 more horse power than 1983 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1983 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Jeep CJ weights approximately 210 kg more than 2004 Lotec C 1000.
Because 1983 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Lotec C 1000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 840 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2004 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Jeep CJ | 2004 Lotec C 1000 | |
Make | Jeep | Lotec |
Model | CJ | C 1000 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 5500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 844 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 990 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1150 mm |