1983 Jeep CJ vs. 2004 Saturn L
To start off, 2004 Saturn L is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,196 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Saturn L is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Saturn L (141 HP) has 56 more horse power than 1983 Jeep CJ. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Saturn L should accelerate faster than 1983 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Saturn L weights approximately 86 kg more than 1983 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1983 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Saturn L. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Saturn L (203 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm). This means 2004 Saturn L will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Jeep CJ | 2004 Saturn L | |
| Make | Jeep | Saturn |
| Model | CJ | L |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2004 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 141 HP |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 203 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1376 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2710 mm |
