1983 Jeep CJ vs. 2005 Mercury Mariner
To start off, 2005 Mercury Mariner is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Mariner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercury Mariner (153 HP) has 68 more horse power than 1983 Jeep CJ. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Mariner should accelerate faster than 1983 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Mariner weights approximately 189 kg more than 1983 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1983 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Mercury Mariner. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercury Mariner (206 Nm) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm). This means 2005 Mercury Mariner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Jeep CJ | 2005 Mercury Mariner | |
Make | Jeep | Mercury |
Model | CJ | Mariner |
Year Released | 1983 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 150 Nm | 206 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1479 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2630 mm |