1983 Jeep CJ vs. 2006 Peugeot 207
To start off, 2006 Peugeot 207 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Peugeot 207 (88 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1983 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Peugeot 207 should accelerate faster than 1983 Jeep CJ.
Because 1983 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Peugeot 207. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Jeep CJ (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Peugeot 207. (133 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1983 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Peugeot 207.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Jeep CJ | 2006 Peugeot 207 | |
| Make | Jeep | Peugeot |
| Model | CJ | 207 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1360 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 88 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2610 mm |
