1983 Jeep CJ vs. 2006 Subaru Legacy
To start off, 2006 Subaru Legacy is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Subaru Legacy (242 HP) has 157 more horse power than 1983 Jeep CJ. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Subaru Legacy should accelerate faster than 1983 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Subaru Legacy weights approximately 268 kg more than 1983 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Subaru Legacy (310 Nm @ 6400 RPM) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2006 Subaru Legacy will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Jeep CJ | 2006 Subaru Legacy | |
Make | Jeep | Subaru |
Model | CJ | Legacy |
Year Released | 1983 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1992 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 242 HP |
Torque | 150 Nm | 310 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1558 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2680 mm |