1983 Jeep CJ vs. 2006 Toyota Highlander
To start off, 2006 Toyota Highlander is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,310 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Toyota Highlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Highlander (215 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1983 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 1983 Jeep CJ.
Because 1983 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Toyota Highlander. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota Highlander (301 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota Highlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Jeep CJ | 2006 Toyota Highlander | |
Make | Jeep | Toyota |
Model | CJ | Highlander |
Year Released | 1983 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 3310 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 301 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2720 mm |