1983 Jeep CJ vs. 2006 Volvo S40
To start off, 2006 Volvo S40 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,523 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volvo S40 (218 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1983 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1983 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volvo S40 weights approximately 335 kg more than 1983 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Volvo S40 (320 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2006 Volvo S40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Jeep CJ | 2006 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Jeep | Volvo |
Model | CJ | S40 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2523 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 218 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1625 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2650 mm |