1983 Jeep CJ vs. 2010 BMW X3
To start off, 2010 BMW X3 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 BMW X3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW X3 (260 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 1983 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 1983 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 BMW X3 weights approximately 530 kg more than 1983 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 BMW X3 (305 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2010 BMW X3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Jeep CJ | 2010 BMW X3 | |
Make | Jeep | BMW |
Model | CJ | X3 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4569 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1854 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1676 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2797 mm |