1983 Jeep CJ vs. 2011 Audi R8
To start off, 2011 Audi R8 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Audi R8 (420 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 335 more horse power than 1983 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 1983 Jeep CJ.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Audi R8 (430 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 280 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2011 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Jeep CJ | 2011 Audi R8 | |
| Make | Jeep | Audi |
| Model | CJ | R8 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2011 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 4200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 420 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 7800 RPM |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 430 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4435 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1905 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1245 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2649 mm |
