1983 Jeep CJ vs. 2011 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2011 Dodge Ram is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Dodge Ram (212 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1983 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1983 Jeep CJ.
Because 1983 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Dodge Ram. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Dodge Ram (235 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2011 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Jeep CJ | 2011 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Jeep | Dodge |
Model | CJ | Ram |
Year Released | 1983 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 235 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 5320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2900 mm |