1983 Jeep CJ vs. 2012 Peugeot RCZ
To start off, 2012 Peugeot RCZ is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Peugeot RCZ (156 HP) has 71 more horse power than 1983 Jeep CJ. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot RCZ should accelerate faster than 1983 Jeep CJ.
Because 1983 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Peugeot RCZ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Peugeot RCZ has automatic transmission and 1983 Jeep CJ has manual transmission. 1983 Jeep CJ will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Peugeot RCZ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Jeep CJ | 2012 Peugeot RCZ | |
| Make | Jeep | Peugeot |
| Model | CJ | RCZ |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 156 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4287 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1845 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1359 mm |
