1983 Lancia Beta vs. 2002 Pontiac Aztek
To start off, 2002 Pontiac Aztek is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Lancia Beta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Lancia Beta would be higher. At 3,392 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Pontiac Aztek is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Pontiac Aztek (176 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1983 Lancia Beta. (116 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Pontiac Aztek should accelerate faster than 1983 Lancia Beta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Pontiac Aztek weights approximately 786 kg more than 1983 Lancia Beta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Pontiac Aztek is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Lancia Beta. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Pontiac Aztek will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Pontiac Aztek (298 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Lancia Beta. (165 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2002 Pontiac Aztek will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Lancia Beta.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Lancia Beta | 2002 Pontiac Aztek | |
| Make | Lancia | Pontiac |
| Model | Beta | Aztek |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 3392 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 116 HP | 176 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 298 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.9:1 | 8.6:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1044 kg | 1830 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 4630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 69 L |
