1983 Lancia Beta vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Lancia Beta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Lancia Beta would be higher. At 2,946 cc, 2008 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Renault Clio weights approximately 291 kg more than 1983 Lancia Beta.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Renault Clio (301 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Lancia Beta. (165 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Lancia Beta.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Lancia Beta | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | Lancia | Renault |
Model | Beta | Clio |
Year Released | 1983 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Middle | Middle |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2946 cc |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 165 Nm | 301 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 82.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1044 kg | 1335 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.7 L/100km | 11.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 61 L |