1983 Lancia Beta vs. 2010 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2010 Kia Cadenza is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Lancia Beta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Lancia Beta would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Kia Cadenza is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Cadenza (201 HP) has 85 more horse power than 1983 Lancia Beta. (116 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 1983 Lancia Beta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Cadenza weights approximately 531 kg more than 1983 Lancia Beta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1983 Lancia Beta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Lancia Beta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cadenza, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Lancia Beta | 2010 Kia Cadenza | |
Make | Lancia | Kia |
Model | Beta | Cadenza |
Year Released | 1983 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 201 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1044 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 4965 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2845 mm |