1983 Lancia Delta vs. 1996 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 1996 Mazda RX-7 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Lancia Delta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Lancia Delta would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1996 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Lancia Delta (250 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1996 Mazda RX-7. (238 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Lancia Delta should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda RX-7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda RX-7 weights approximately 10 kg more than 1983 Lancia Delta.
Because 1983 Lancia Delta is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mazda RX-7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Lancia Delta will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mazda RX-7 (296 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Lancia Delta. (290 Nm). This means 1996 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Lancia Delta.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Lancia Delta | 1996 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Lancia | Mazda |
Model | Delta | RX-7 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1759 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 238 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 296 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 55 L |