1983 Lancia Delta vs. 2011 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2011 Ford Falcon is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Lancia Delta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Lancia Delta would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford Falcon (261 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1983 Lancia Delta. (250 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1983 Lancia Delta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford Falcon weights approximately 404 kg more than 1983 Lancia Delta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1983 Lancia Delta is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Lancia Delta will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford Falcon (391 Nm) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Lancia Delta. (290 Nm). This means 2011 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Lancia Delta. 2011 Ford Falcon has automatic transmission and 1983 Lancia Delta has manual transmission. 1983 Lancia Delta will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Ford Falcon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Lancia Delta | 2011 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Lancia | Ford |
| Model | Delta | Falcon |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1759 cc | 3983 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 261 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 290 Nm | 391 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.5 mm | 92.3 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 71.4 mm | 99.3 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.6:1 | 10.3:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1704 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4967 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1868 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1433 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2838 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 68 L |
