1983 Lancia Prisma vs. 1966 Renault 4
To start off, 1983 Lancia Prisma is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Renault 4 would be higher. At 1,497 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Lancia Prisma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Lancia Prisma (85 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1966 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Lancia Prisma should accelerate faster than 1966 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Lancia Prisma weights approximately 300 kg more than 1966 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Lancia Prisma | 1966 Renault 4 | |
Make | Lancia | Renault |
Model | Prisma | 4 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1497 cc | 746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.4 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 60 L |