1983 Land Rover Serie III vs. 2008 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Land Rover Serie III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Land Rover Serie III would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Land Rover Serie III weights approximately 213 kg more than 2008 Mazda CX-9.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1983 Land Rover Serie III has manual transmission. 1983 Land Rover Serie III will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Land Rover Serie III | 2008 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Land Rover | Mazda |
Model | Serie III | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2286 cc | 3726 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 270 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1404 kg | 1191 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2880 mm |