1983 Land Rover Serie III vs. 2012 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2012 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Land Rover Serie III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Land Rover Serie III would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 559 kg more than 1983 Land Rover Serie III.
Because 1983 Land Rover Serie III is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Mazda CX-9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Land Rover Serie III will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1983 Land Rover Serie III has manual transmission. 1983 Land Rover Serie III will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Land Rover Serie III | 2012 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Land Rover | Mazda |
Model | Serie III | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2286 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 273 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1404 kg | 1963 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 5085 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1935 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1727 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2875 mm |