1983 Lincoln Continental vs. 1970 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1983 Lincoln Continental is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,940 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Lincoln Continental (129 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1970 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1970 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 355 kg more than 1970 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 Lincoln Continental (310 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1983 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Lincoln Continental | 1970 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Lincoln | Triumph |
Model | Continental | 2000 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4940 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2700 mm |